Sunday, 7 December 2008

Why I haven't been blogging... The Cheese Yard



I have been workign on a new business venture, which has now been launched - www.thecheeseyard.com

We offer a wide range of wonderful cheese boxes. You can choose one of our fantastic selection boxes containing 4 different varieties of cheese. Maybe the Devon Selection is what takes your fancy, or perhaps the Cheddar or Blue Selection is for you. Whatever your preference, one of our 11 different selections should meet your needs.

If there's a particular cheese you like, you choose from our range of individual cheese boxes. We offer a wide range of wonderful Great British and European cheese all sourced from award winning dairies. Each individual cheese box will contain 1 kilo of your chosen cheese.

A perfect gift for the cheese fanatic you know (or maybe just for yourself) is a subscription to our Cheese Club. Join for a year and receive one of our specially chosen selection boxes at a frequency of your choosing. Available monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly or twice a year.

Please come and visit us at www.thecheeseyard.com - we're sure you'll find something you like.

All orders come in our attractive Cheese Yard gift boxes and and contain a neat little refrigeration sheet to ensure the cheese reaches you in perfect condition. We can send your gift out as soon as it's ready or on a date of your choosing. If the box is for a gift, you can even add a personalised message to go onto a gift card for the lucky recipient.

Our first twenty customers will also receive a little extra gift as a thank-you. 

Thank you in advance for your custom and we hope you enjoy our cheese!

Friday, 7 November 2008

Northern Crock


Banks Standard Variable Rate as at 3.30pm:

Abbey 5.44%
Lloyds TSB 5.00%
RBS 5.19%

B&B 7.09%
Northern Rock 7.34%

No wonder Northern Rock is repaying it's debt to the government quicker than expected. This is in excusable. The two wholly owned Government banks are charging it's customer 2 to 2.5 percentage points higher interest now than the other institutions the Government now has an interest in.

Remember, the executives of any company have a statutory duty to act in the interests of their shareholders. If the Government, as 100% owner of these banks, wants action to be taken on interest rates it can demand it. So why has it not?


5pm Update:

According to the BBC, Northern Rock have reduced their SVR by 1.5% to 5.84%. Very welcome, but still at least 0.4% higher than any of the high street lenders.


Brown's New Weapon


It seems that Gordon Brown, fresh from the by-election win in Glenrothes, has a new found confidence. In previous weeks instead of action, he has been urging, asking and hoping that other people would bail the Government out of the economic problems the UK faces. He has been polite in his request to banks, petrol companies, Gulf States, the European Union, the IMF and just anybody else he can find that might have a few pounds to spare.

But not anymore. Now our beloved Prime Minister is taking decisive action. No more mister nice guy. He has a new weapon to use. It is staggering in it's potency. The new approach is this:

Do as we ask - or I'll arrange a meeting for you to see Alistair Darling.

The BBC reports here that, with only Lloyds TSB having announced it will pass on the 1.5% interest rate cut, the Government has held a meeting with bankers.

Jack Straw shook his head angrily on Question Time last night when Brian Eno said that the Government had effectively nationalised the risks in the banking sector, while the profits remain in the private sector. But Eno is correct. We all know that Libor is the key to lending, but with Government providing guarantees on lending, liquidity injections, swaps of risky assets to prop up banks, then it must also extract a price in return.

It is no good to simply ask, expect and arrange meetings. Individuals and small businesses are hurting now because of failures in strategy and decision making by banks and by failures in regulation by the Government.  Action must be taken...

More From The Daily Show...

I thought the Daily Show and the Colbert Report might struggle to adjust to Obama being President. But for now, Jon Stewart remains on great form. These clips are from last night:

Sarah Palin is so dumb...



Even Jon Stewart thinks that Gordon Brown is weird...



Black Liberal Guilt...


Fox News on The Daily Show



An amusing interview of Fox News' Chris Wallace from the Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

Thursday, 6 November 2008

Republican Recriminations



The recriminations in the Republican party have well and truly started. The news today being reported in Fox News about the in-fighting between the Palin and McCain camps and the lack of Sarah Palin's knowledge is worrying.

The first thing that has to be said, is thank heavens Obama won the election. The USA needed intelligence and gravitas in the White House, not a joke. For all the talk of a bandwagon developing for a Palin bid for the Presidency in 2012, it needs to be resisted and the Republicans must find serious and heavyweight leadership for the party.

But not only do these stories highlight the concerns many had with the prospect of a Palin Vice-Presidency, they raise serious questions over McCain's judgement and how Palin passed any sort of vetting process to be chosen for the ticket. What is clear now is that the Palin choice was a stunt aimed at boosting McCain in the polls, and not a serious decision on someone who would be a heartbeat away from the Presidency.

What also is interesting, is that even Fox News is starting to debunk the theory that McCain was leading in the polls until the problems with the economy really came to the fore with the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy. The idea that McCain would have won the election if it wasn't for the economic crisis is just wrong. Analysis of the polling now shows that the McCain lead started to wane after Palin's now infamously inept interview with Katie Couric on CBS.

The choice of Palin sealed McCain's fate in the election. He gambled by chosing Palin and it failed. It blunted the attack on Obama's inexperience and turned off many independents. To Obama's credit, he never faltered or panicked when the Palin pick was dominating the news and the polls gave a bounce to Palin. He and his team recognised that the election was not decided months before polling date and that Palin would become a liability.

Thankfully, it seems that being able to see Russia from Alaska is not enough these days to win a US election...

Delusion

I believe there is a demand, now, for cards - and as I go round the country I regularly have people coming up to me and saying they don't want to wait that long
Those are the words of Home Secretary Jacqui Smith today as she announced a pre-registration scheme for ID cards for early next year and a trial of ID cards at Manchester and City for later next year.

She is clearly deluded.

What out the hoards of people who have been telling here they don't want ID cards? It is insulting to our intelligence that she thinks that by keep telling us that some people want ID cards we will all fall into line and support their introduction.

When will the Government learn that it can admit mistakes.  I thought that after heavy election defeats over the last year the Government were now meant to be listening to what it was being told. Exactly who are they listening to? Are they paying any attention to what they are hearing?

The Labour Government have been given an easy route out of the whole ID cards mess with the credit crisis. An announcement that they are to be shelved because, at this time of uncertainty, the costs can not be justified would be welcomed and appreciated. It would also blunt a huge source of expenditure savings that the Tories and Lib Dems have planned. But somewhere in the Labour Party the calculation has been made that they need to appear tough on terrorism and the policy will backfire on the opposition parties. I really do wonder whether the Government are banking on there being a terrorist incident before any general election so they can so 'I told you so'.

I just don't get it. A voluntary ID card system is not wanted and would not be successful. It will cost a fortune and right now the electorate is surely in no mood to have to pay for the 'privilege' of carrying these ID cards personally.

So Jacqui Smith, are you really listening? If so, drop the plans for ID cards...

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

Time for a Novice












Well what a night it was.

A truly momentous win by Barack Obama. He won and won big. He won every state that Kerry did in 2004 and gained Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, New Mexico, Virginia, and it seems North Carolina will go his way. He won 52% of the popular vote. All night, he just won...

The victory speech in Chicago at 5am UK time was something I will never forget - a spine tingling moment. It was the same feeling I had back at University sitting watching the television in awe as the Berlin Wall was pulled down. I thought the speech was stunning, delivered with passion and supreme confidence. Excuse me for repeating some if it here:

If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible, who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time, who still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.

It's the answer told by lines that stretched around schools and churches in numbers this nation has never seen, by people who waited three hours and four hours, many for the first time in their lives, because they believed that this time must be different, that their voices could be that difference.

It's the answer spoken by young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled. Americans who sent a message to the world that we have never been just a collection of individuals or a collection of red states and blue states.

We are, and always will be, the United States of America.

It's the answer that led those who've been told for so long by so many to be cynical and fearful and doubtful about what we can achieve to put their hands on the arc of history and bend it once more toward the hope of a better day.

And to all those watching tonight from beyond our shores, from parliaments and palaces, to those who are huddled around radios in the forgotten corners of the world, our stories are singular, but our destiny is shared, and a new dawn of American leadership is at hand.

To those -- to those who would tear the world down: We will defeat you. To those who seek peace and security: We support you. And to all those who have wondered if America's beacon still burns as bright: Tonight we proved once more that the true strength of our nation comes not from the might of our arms or the scale of our wealth, but from the enduring power of our ideals: democracy, liberty, opportunity and unyielding hope.

That's the true genius of America: that America can change. Our union can be perfected. What we've already achieved gives us hope for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

I had endorsed Obama some time ago. I have long had the view that his election was necessary to restore the reputation of the US in the world. His election has huge symbolism for the US too. Love him or hate him, I don't think anyone can not have been moved by the sight of Jesse Jackson in tears to see what Obama had achieved.  40 years ago he was at Martin Luther King's side as he was shot dead in Memphis. Today he was standing in Grant Park, Chicago listening to Obama as everything he and the civil rights movement had worked so hard for and sacrificed so much to finally achieved the dream.

Obama has managed to inspire many of those who needed to be inspired. What a night it was...

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

History Part III


It's Jeremy Paxman's turn now.
If the vote goes with the polls, the result of the election will go down in history
Surely which ever way the vote goes tonight, the result will become part of history...

Colbert's Campaign Winners and Losers



My Biggest Hope for Election Night


My biggest hope for election night tonight is that Jeremy Vine doesn't attempt any gun-slinging antics in his graphical analysis of the results on the BBC coverage.

Please Mr Vine, no gimmicks tonight. Just treat the audience as adults and present the facts with gravitas.

We shall see...

Johnson's England


Martin Johnson has announced his first England team for the test against the Pacific Islanders this weekend:


D Armitage (London Irish); P Sackey (Wasps), J Noon (Newcastle), R Flutey (Wasps), U Monye (Harlequins); D Cipriani (Wasps), D Care (Harlequins); A Sheridan (Sale Sharks), L Mears (Bath), M Stevens (Bath), S Borthwick (Saracens, captain), N Kennedy (London Irish), T Croft (Leicester), T Rees (Wasps), N Easter (Harlequins).

Replacements: D Hartley (Northampton), P Vickery (Wasps), T Palmer (Wasps), J Haskell (Wasps), M Lipman (Bath), H Ellis (Leicester), T Flood (Leicester).


I like the look of this team, and on paper it is one of the most exciting back lines England have ever selected. Johnson has picked some of the real in-form players from the Guinness Premiership (Armitage, Monye, Care, Kennedy, Croft) and dropped some of the 'old-guard' (Lewsey, Kay, Worsely).

The combination at 10-12 of Wasps team mates Cipriani and Flutey should add plenty of much needed creativity to the back line and will hopefully fire the speedy trio of Armitage, Sackey and Monye. I'm sure Brian Smith (the new England attack coach) had a huge influence over this selection.

Jamie Noon is perhaps the beneficiary of some injuries to other available centres, but should add some grunt and defensive stability at 13.

In the forwards, it is great to see London Irish's Nick Kennedy finally get his chance at this level. In recent years, Engand's line out hasn't functioned as smoothly as it should so the addition of the best line out winner in the country over the last 3 years should guarantee more far more possession from both their own and their opponents line out. Under the new ELVs, securing possession from set pieces has become even more important.

Lee Mears is the selection at hooker, although doubts must remain as to whether he is big enough at test level. For sure it will be interesting to see how Dylan Hartley performs in that role if he gets a run out as substitute. But with Mears, Stevens, Croft, Rees and Easter all selected in the pack is not short of pace and ball handling abilities. We have seen in the Tri-Nations and Heineken Cup this year the importance under the ELVs of the forwards being able to add continuity and pace in attack. The question mark will be whether this pack have the ability to compete strongly enough in the rucks and mauls to secure quick ball when in possession and to slow down and turnover the opposition's possession.

Without doubt, Martin Johnson has stamped his own vision on to this first selection under his new reign. This is the start of a new era for English rugby. Previous attempts under Andy Robinson and Brian Ashton since the World Cup victory in 2003 have proved to be false dawns. I suspect that this time, with Johnson at the helm, things it will be very different...

Tactical Brilliance


Harry Redknapp's advice to his star striker Roman Pavlyuchenko - "just f***king run around".

The Dangerous Consequence of the Brand/Ross Situation


The dangerous consequence for the BBC of the Brand/Ross saga is that every joke that is slightly offensive or in someway risque is going to attract complaints and media interest. The 'complaining' lobby have got their teeth into the BBC, found they have an impact, and will now be out for further scalps.

For instance, today it is being reported that the BBC received nearly 200 comments about a joke made by Jeremy Clarkson on Sunday's Top Gear. As a result, Ofcom are looking into the programme.

Jeremy Clarkson has long found difficulty in people not understanding that his on screen persona is just that - a persona. It is meant to be a caricature. As a result, some of the things he says may appear to be insensitive or offensive to some people. But surely, that is the expectation you must have if you switch on a Jeremy Clarkson programme? Just the same as if you switch on a Marcus Brigstocke programme you expect him at some point to insult Jeremy Clarkson.

The comments made by Clarkson are in no way analogous to the awful stunt pulled by Brand and Ross. The BBC and Ofcom must be very careful that in all this media hyperbole, normal witty and comedic comments are not stifled. Talent such as Clarkson and programmes such as the wonderful Top Gear must not be reigned in... 

History Part II


Gordon Brown is at it now. According to the Telegraph, Gordon Brown has said today: 

I think whatever the result of the American election... history has been made in this campaign

Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us Prime Minister.  I really had no idea, until you provided enlightenment, that events happen and then they become history...

Iran's Very Own Jeffrey Archer


It seems that the Iranian Government has it's very own version of Jeffrey Archer. The BBC reports that Interior Minister Ali Kordan has been sacked after admitting that a degree he claimed was from Oxford University was actually a forgery (and a poor one at that).

The Minister's Walter Mitty claim was discovered after the degree certificate was found to be from 'London Oxford University' and littered with spelling mistakes.

According to the BBC, the scandal has made the former minister a national laughing stock, with a fake resignation letter being passed round purporting to be from him, but full of misprints and crossings-out.

One can hope, but I just wonder whether anyone has checked Peter Madelson's degree certificate out...

History


The BBC news website is leading with this headline today:












Just a thought, but doesn't every US poll become historic once it happens?

Monday, 3 November 2008

Ye Gods (and little fishes)


Ye Gods (and little fishes) is the title of the new album from Martin Carr.

Those of you who know me will have heard me gone on and on for about 15 years now about how good this man's music is. Martin was the writer and guitarist for The Boo Radleys before embarking on a solo project under than name Bravecaptain. He has now decided to launch the next phases of his music career under his own name.

Now, the new album isn't actually out yet.  To fund the release of the album Martin is using Bandstocks. This is a new concept whereby for an investment equivalent to the cost of an album (£10 per stock), not only do you receive a copy of the album upon release but a share of the net receipts from album sales in addition to various other benefits including an album credit.

I would encourage you to listen to some tracks at Martin's MySpace site which can be found here.

This is what Martin has to say about the project:

Hello and welcome to something different.

When I recorded this album at the beginning of the year I had no ideas as to how, or in what form, it would appear. I haven't released any music on a label for over four years and enjoy being able to work in a place where I can have full reign over the varying facets of record production, from songwriting to sleeve design. I have no desire to sign to another record label. Creation Records was the only label I ever wanted to be on and I'm proud to have been associated with that name but that was then, this is now and the future is ours to grasp with eager hands.

Now one of the few things that a label was useful for was M.O.N.E.Y. Studios don't pay for themselves, there are press officers, pluggers, accountants, lawyers, managers, agents and musicians, all of them essential, none of them free. I'm not very good at asking for money, Homer Simpson once said 'I lost creative control of the project and I forgot to ask for any money' and that just about sums up my business acumen.

I see this as different, this is something new and I'm not asking for handouts, subs, aid, relief, alms, gifts or charity. I'm asking for you to get involved. I'm not going to pretend that you can call me up and demand that I use more sitar on the future recordings or suggest that I should get my bloody hair cut but you will make it possible for me to make music and if that music does well then so will you. At the very least your tenner will buy you a great album working out at one english pound per song.

The people involved in this project believe that the artist and the audience are the key and the contract I have signed is a dream. Nobody is getting ripped off and there are no hidden clauses, small print or invisible ink provisos. This is it, the future is ours to create.

If you like the music and like the idea, please go over to the Martin Carr page at Bandstocks and perhaps make an investment.

Brown's Communication Problem


The contrast in the reaction to Lewis Hamilton's victory between Gordon Brown and David Cameron perfectly illustrates one of the Prime Minister's biggest problems - a total inability to communicate to the public on a 'human' level.

In interviews, with a forced smile he managed to reel off a pre-prepared statement which seemed to take every piece of excitement out the sporting drama that proceeded it. It even needed to be listened to a few times to see if made sense, which I'm not sure if it does:

I, like so many, want to congratulate him on becoming world champion. I think the whole country is thrilled by his exceptional talent. The whole of Britain is now congratulating him, and is proud of the inspirational achievement of Lewis and the McLaren team.

The country may have been thrilled by an exciting, nail-biting race that finished with Lewis Hamilton's victory, but not by his 'exceptional talent' - 'exceptional talent' is not thrilling. The country may be proud of Lewis Hamilton, but not 'of the inspirational achievement of Lewis Hamilton'. My guess would also be that the whole of Britain hasn't yet got Lewis' phone number and so we can not all be 'congratulating him' tonight.

Compare that with David Cameron's quote:

Congratulations to Lewis Hamilton who has made everyone in Britain so very proud. One of the most dramatic races in Formula One history ended with the right man winning the world championship. Lewis is not just the youngest ever winner of the championship he is now officially a British sporting legend and a role model for what you can achieve if you follow your dream.

If the Prime Minister has problems communicating such an easy message following a wonderful sporting success, what hope has he of communicating any sort of coherent vision for the future of this country?

Why Obama Will Win

Barack Obama will win the Presidential election tomorrow. I concede, that's not the boldest of predictions but with the polling consistently showing a lead it is the likely outcome. What makes me more certain is a look at the electoral college map of the USA for the previous two elections - elections won by the Republicans.

Here (courtesy of CNN) are the results of the last two elections.


2000



2004


In 2004, Kerry lost by 34 electoral college votes with just 3 states changing hands from the 2000 election - New Hampshire moving to the Democrats while New Mexico and Iowa moving to the Republicans.

With the polling as it is, it seems very likely that Obama will win all the states that Kerry won for the Democrats in 2000. If he does this, then it's going to take very little to move the number of electoral college votes in Obama's favour. For instance, if Florida moves Democrat then one state alone will mean a swing of 54 votes to Obama and the election will be won.

But it's just not Florida that happens with. If Obama wins Ohio for the Democrats, that would be a swing of 40 votes and a victory.  If Obama manages to take back New Mexico's 5 votes, then he would just need North Carolina's 15 votes for a swing of 40 votes and a victory. If Obama manages to take back both New Mexico and Iowa that would be 12 more votes and mean winning just about any other red state will, once again, give him victory.

Given the results from the previous two very tight elections together with the current national and battleground state polling, it is very difficult to see the electoral maths being anything other than very favourable to Obama. It is hard to see McCain being on the offensive in any Democratic state right now, leaving him having to struggle to defend every Republican state to get a victory.  I just can't see him doing that.

Obama will win tomorrow night, the only question for me that remains is just how large will his margin of victory be?

Sunday, 2 November 2008

October Blog Stats










188 Absolute Unique Visitors

356 Site Visits

864 Page Views

These are the stats for the first month of this blog. The spike in visitors at the end of the month was due to this post from Iain Dale with a link to the site.

Congratulations Lewis!




















Congratulation Lewis Hamilton.  2008 World Champion after an extraordinary race!

Forget the Bradley Effect...


Time has a good article today from Joel Stein, suggesting that is it not the Bradley effect that Barack Obama should be concerned with as voters enter the poll booths, but his lack of cool - the same thing that hurt Al Gore and John Kerry. It is tongue in cheek, but do read it.  In it he says that:

I am, however, deeply worried about the Urkel effect, which holds that voters leaning toward Obama will walk into the voting booth and suddenly think, I cannot take four years of listening to that giant-eared nerd. Because people are starting to realize that Obama is not all that cool. He's earnest like C-3PO, emotionless like Spock, overly practical like Encyclopedia Brown and incredibly skinny like C-3PO, Spock and Encyclopedia Brown.

Obama seemed cool at first because he uses slang, dresses well and bumps fists. But a lifetime of dangerous undercover work makes it easy for me to spot a fellow nerd. Obama has done a good job passing, with his nice suits, easy smile and attractive wife. But those are just the over-30 nerd trappings of success. Have you seen him try to dance? It's like watching a white guy make fun of other white guys. Sure, he played high school basketball, but how many cool kids play indoor sports in Hawaii? The man is all superego. He never gets angry or flirts with hot chicks by asking them to be his Vice President. Obama has written about using pot and cocaine, but a New York Times article found only school buddies who said he merely dabbled with marijuana. That's because the only people who bring up their drug use didn't really do drugs. Try asking George W. Bush about alleged cocaine use. You'll see how the nonnerds play it.

Mind you, if he thinks that Barack Obama might have a cool problem, spare a thought for John McCain...

Gordon Brown's New Policy - Hope


The Guardian has the story that Gordon Brown is hopeful of success in his attempts to persuade dollar-rich Gulf states to prop up ailing national economies through a massive injection of capital into the International Monetary Fund.

It seems that our beloved decisive Prime Minister, not satisfied with his attempts to 'urge' everyone into action (see my previous post), is now resorting to 'hope' to get us all through the current economic crisis.

Now is the time for firm action from you Mr Brown, not hope...

Barclays Bank Funding.


Fraser Nelson has written an interesting piece in the Coffee House today on Barclays opting to take Middle East cash rather than Government cash for it's recapitalisation. In it he says that:

The angry reaction to Barclays' decision to recapitalise using Middle Eastern money rather than a taxpayer bailout mystifies me. In my News of the World column today, I argue that Barclays may well become 30% Arab but its 100% correct. It has no duty to accept a UK taxpayer bailout over more expensive Arab money, as is widely suggested. Its duty, in fact, lies is in the reverse. A taxpayer bailout is supposed to be the last resort, preventing the banking system from collapse.

I'm glad that John Varley, Barclays' chief executive, realises that even if some politicians do not. As Guido notes, Vince Cable has disgraced himself in claiming Barclays should have gone with the taxpayer. The patriotism argument, that British taxpayer financing is preferable to Arab money, is also nonsense: who do you think the British government borrows from? Barclays has just cut out the middleman.

Another popular argument is that the only possible explanation for Varley's actions is that he wants to keep paying himself and his directors bonuses. In fact, they have bought something far more precious: freedom from government. As Varley knows, the road to disaster starts when you start inviting government to help manage your company. The last thing any company wants is Gordon Brown or his proxies popping up saying "Only me!" and then launching on "You dont want to do it like that" Harry Enfield-style diktats, which the Scottish banks now have to swallow. If Barclays' rivals are operating under state directions (including demands to keep mortgage lending at 2007 levels) then they will soon be in real trouble. Barclays shareholders will realise this, I suspect, and for all their moans vote the new deal through.

On the whole, I do agree with him. The history of banks is that there is cyclical ownership by one country of a large number of banks then take overs from other countries as strength of economies change. All the man traditional British banks have long since been taken over by European and American banks. There is no more Barings, SG Warburgs or Cazenove Banks anymore - they are now part of ING, UBS and JP Morgan.  In the US, there is no more Salomon Brothers, Dillon Read, First Boston - thy are now part of Citibank, UBS and Credit Suisse. We have to accept that finanical power moves on and will always do so.  Arab, Chinese and Indian Banks will be the new powers instead of US and European Banks.

However, when seeking funds Chairman must make sure that they are seen to be acting in the Shareholders' interests (which is their statutory duty) and not their own interests in protecting their own executives' large shareholdings and bonuses. For too long in the banking sector, mergers and takeovers have been instigated because of the benefit that accrues to the executives rather than the Shareholders. In the Barclays Banks deal, the terms that the new money coming in has not been made public, but one of the reasons to go for more expensive funding is that the terms are less onerous on the executives. The same question has to be asked with the Mitsubishi financing for Morgan Stanley (the main benefactor being John Mack himself). While Fraser Nelson is right in suggesting that there are good reasons to be free of Government interference, Government ownership can also bring benefits as well, such as a better credit rating and cheaper day to day funding. For banks, the credit rating can be king when it comes to longer term survival and business opportunities. Don't forget that Barclays benefits by Government bail outs of other banks. If RBS, HBOS and other US banks did go under, they would have faced huge losses on their exposures.

But let's give Barclays Banks the benefit of the doubt and assume they have gone for the option that is more beneficial to the longer term interests of the Shareholders of the Bank. Where Fraser Nelson is incorrect in his article is in the following paragraph:

...the big picture is that a British bank has been saved and without recourse to semi-nationalisation. If the Barclays deal goes wrong, the UK taxpayer will have no liability (one shudders to think how we'll be stung by what horrors the semi-nationalised banks have to unveil). In the last analysis, we should all be glad that Barclays has (as the Guardian put it) avoided taking cash from the British taxpayer because the British taxpayer has no more cash to offer. Varley should be knighted, not pilloried. He has fended off immense pressure from the Treasury to swallow the bailout, and preserved for the nation a strong, independent bank. I only wish that the Scottish banks had been in a position to do the same.


Does he really think that if the Barclays deal goes wrong the British taxpayer will have no liability? Of course it will - there is no way that the Government will let such a large an important institution as Barclays go under. If the deal goes wrong, it will absolutely be the British taxpayer who will have to pick up the bill in a further bail out.

This is the myth we have no discovered with the British banking sector (the same myth that exists with large public/private partnership PFI deals). The myth is that in reality there is no private sector risk. If everything goes well, the private sector (in this case banks) takes all the upside in profits. If things go very badly, there is a public sector bail out. It is therefore the public sector, the British taxpayers, who bare the risk.

The unfortunate outcome of the Credit Crisis is that while hundreds and thousands of 'ordinary' workers are losing their jobs, the personal fortunes in shareholdings and favourable pensions for executives are being protected. Let's not kid ourselves about risk and reward and the motives behind the sudden rush to accept large injections of non-Government cash into the Banks. While we on the right of centre may be in favour of as little Government interference into the private sector as possible, we must also press for regulation to be in place to ensure that those responsible for poor decision making and bad managing of the banks do not benefit and instead have to bare the results of bad risk taking themselves...

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Horrific Talk


The BBC reports that the Defence Minister, Quentin Davies, has said that he is horrified by accusations made by Major Sebastian Morely, a former commander in the SAS. The Daily Telegraph today reported that:

Major Sebastian Morley claims that Whitehall officials and military commanders repeatedly ignored his warnings that people would be killed if they continued to allow troops to be transported in the vulnerable Snatch Land Rovers.

As a result, he says Cpl Sarah Bryant – the first female soldier to die in Afghanistan – and three male colleagues, the SAS soldiers, Cpl Sean Reeve, L/Cpl Richard Larkin and Paul Stout were killed needlessly.

All four died when their lightly armoured Snatch Land Rover split apart after hitting a landmine in Helmand province in June.
In his resignation letter, Major Morley, the commander of D Squadron, 23 SAS, said "chronic underinvestment" in equipment by the Ministry of Defence was to blame for their deaths.

Quentin Davies is an insensitive idiot.

This is not horrific. What is horrific is that time after time British soldiers have lost their lives because they have been sent into warfare inappropriately equipped. We have a duty to ensure that if we send our armed faces into battle to make sure they have the correct equipment to do the job. When there are repeated claims by those serving in Afghanistan and Iraq of problems with equipment, instead of the Government's disgraceful tactic spinning against those making their worries public, there should be a show of humility and respect for those laying their lives on their line.

Friday, 31 October 2008

McCain's Prank?



UN Failure in DRC

It is with great regret that I read today's reports of the escalation of violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The situation there is dreadful and shows just how ineffective the United Nations can be.

But this situation has been building for so long now, there can be no excuse for the international community and the United Nations has failed to do whatever has been necessary to ensure peace, and more importantly protect the people who are now currently suffering.

For too long, what has been going on in DRC has been largely ignored and the long standing ineffectiveness of the United Nations mission in DRC has been overlooked. When the world was focussing on the wrongs of the American soldiers with respect to the Abu Ghraib prison controversy in Iraq, the abuses committed by UN soldiers in DRC were totally glossed over. When they finally did make the news, the UN downplayed the significance.  But abuses are abuses and this reflected a severe lack of judgement and responsibility of the UN towards the DRC mission.

Several years on and the chickens have come home to roost. The UN's commitment and deployment in DRC although seemingly large in number (I believe 17,000 was the latest number) was woefully short of what was required for such a large area and for such a violent conflict.

It is time the United Nations ponders upon it's role in the world. If it is to address conflicts, then deployments must be whole hearted and not taken demonstrations. It's failure to ensure that the peacekeeping force in DRC was effective in doing it's job - peacekeeping - has now exacerbated the problem severely and left the UN looking totally impotent. It has lost the goodwill and respect of the every people it was mean to protect.

The UN has been made to look foolish in the DRC, but in the scheme of things that doesn't really matter.  What does matter is people. The people the UN is meant to safeguard. A human catastrophe has been allowed to take place in the DRC on the UN's watch. For that to have happened is disgraceful...

Trick or Treat

(Guest post from David Beresford)

What a treat to hear Comrade Osborne on the Today programme giving a detailed plan for the Conservative solution to the current economic difficulties. Quite clearly Osborne wants to put his personal tricky troubles behind him, but speeches without substance are somewhat pointless. Apart from suggesting that council tax should be frozen and that a tax rise on family cars next year should be scrapped, he said nothing. Sorry that is not true. Five times he suggested that the Bank of England should get on with its job and cut interest rates. The Bank of England does not set interest rates, that is the role of the monetary policy committee. I hope, as a potential chancellor, he understands the difference.


Thursday, 30 October 2008

Colbert Endorses Obama



Where's the Action?


After the bail out plan for the banks, it strikes me that there has been little in the way of real action from the Government in helping individuals and business.  Every time I read a report of Alistair Darling or Gordon Brown, they seem to be urging and discussing action but doing very little.

They are urging the energy companies to reduce petrol prices, the banks to maintain lending levels to each other and to small businesses, mortgage-lenders not to repossess homes so quickly, local government to advance capital spending programmes.  But urging is simply just not enough.

The Government is in a state of disarray now (and this is why David Cameron and the Tories should be patient and not panic about being crowded out of the news right now).  Any action they are looking to take, as in today's announcement of loans form the European Investment Bank, seems to be at the supra-national level.  There is no admission that the Government finances are in no position to do much at the national level. It is now stymied by Government expenditure over the last 10 years to maintain false employment levels through vastly increasing public sector jobs and by it's expenditure and commitment to the two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  It makes announcements only to reel back on them when placed under scrutiny (such as the capital spending proposal which they were later forced to admit  they were only suggesting bringing planned expenditure forward - quite how capital processes planned for future years can be advanced they haven't yet managed to explain).

But culpability on the lack of action lays not solely with the Government.  In a week where the Federal Reserve in the US have again reduced interest rates, where is the action by the Bank of England?  I have long stated that the 'independence' of the Bank of England is a myth - it is not independent if it's economic aims and targets are set by the Government.  Interest Rates should be a lot lower than they are now - the greatest danger to the economy for the last 6 months has been the threat of bank collapses and recession, not inflation.  But significant action on interest rates as not been taken.

The MPC can not wait month to month to decide whether any action over interest rates should be taken. It has to be seen to be pro-active not reactionary in doing something with respect to interest rates. The crisis is so dynamic, monthly changes in interest rates are not good enough.

What is needed is proper action that the general public can understand.  We need honesty about plans and abut expenditure. We need admissions of where mistakes have been made. We need clear statements of where the Government can have a proper impact and where it can not.

But right now I would suggest the following immediate action:

1) Reduce interest rates by 1 percentage point
2) Enforce interbank lending between British Banks as a price for the guarantees and funding in place
3) Legislate for a moratorium on house repossessions for a year
4) 1% cut in small business corporation tax
5) 6 month employers NIC contributions holiday for small businesses
6) Announce the abandonment of ID cards and the related planned expenditure

I am not too concerned with a short term increase in expenditure (or reduction on tax revenue) as this can be paid for in a few years time by the sale of the stakes the Government has taken in RBS and Lloyds/HBOS.

The important thing is that we need action not words now...

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

But the Law Won


It is such a shame that that people who make every effort to do what's right are not served well by the law of the land, and those who oversee it. The outcome of Debbie Purdey's action in the High Court today, whereby she has failed to get clarification the law on assisted suicide is totally unsatisfactory for two reasons.

First, as Debbie Purdey herself asks:

How can we make sure that we act within the law if they won't tell us in what circumstances they would prosecute?


What use is a 47 year old law on our statute books (or for that matter any law) if it is impossible to know whether your are abiding by it or not? While clarification may be extremely difficult, the issue is of such public interest that failure even to offer guidance as to how a process could be initiated whereby the law could be clarified is a moral dereliction of duty by the Law Lords. Washing their hands at this stage helps no one.

But more importantly it is a failure by the Law Lords on a human level to Debbie Purdey. By failing to provide guidance to this wonderfully brave woman, who is only trying to make sure her husband is not ensnared in criminal proceedings by her desire for a peaceful and dignified end to her life, the Law Lords have made the remaining time she has with her husband is far more traumatic than it need me.

The Law Lords should have realised that one person's struggle for some dignity was far more important than a strict following of their own role in interpreting law. Something is wrong with our legal system when unaccountable appointed Law Lords let down a desperate woman. Yes, the Law Lords are there to make judgement on the law, but more importantly they are there to serve us all and to see that justice is done...

Tuesday, 28 October 2008

Credit Crisis is God's Punishment


They really can't help it. As sure as eggs is eggs, if there is a problem in this country then at some point a representative of one of this country's religions will tell us that it is 'God's punishment'. Well, guess what? It's the Anglican Bishop of Lewes' turn to try and use people's misfortune to promote his religious views.  The Telegraph reports him writing that:

I believe that God ultimately has allowed this crisis for good. Our nation, like all the western nations, has become consumed with materialism. It has a stranglehold on our lives. We have found our security in 'securities' and have failed to grasp that nothing is permanent other than God. Our confidence has been misplaced. Something was needed to shake that and that is what we are experiencing. If this shakes our confidence in mammon (money) and forces us back to our creator and redeemer it will have been worth it. That should be our prayers as Christians. We may all have to suffer a bit, but God is an expert at bringing good out of sad, difficult, even evil situations.

At a time when the Anglican Church is in crisis itself, with threats of splits and talk of disestablishment, naked plays for moral superiority like this do nothing to enhance it's reputation. It may play well internally, but all religions do themselves a great disservice to get involved with economic and political issues in terms like this.

So, Rt Rev Benn, Bishop of Lewes, I ask you whether God allowed this for good? Where did misplaced confidence lay here?

Perhaps instead of lecturing the public on the morality of the credit crisis, the Anglican Church should consider it's own role and that of God in issues closer to home...

4:13 Dream


I don't plan to post often about this blogger's music preferences, but today I am a happy blogger as The Cure have released their new album 4:13 Dream.  Cure albums do not come around too often these days, so days like this are to be savoured.

Any further posts today will be suitably inspired by the great Robert Smith.

"For my part I know nothing with certainty... but the sight of the stars makes me dream" (Van Gogh)

Are Standards at Cambridge University Slipping?















This picture is from outside Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.  The full article from the Daily Telegraph is here...

Palin Wigs




Thanks to David Beresford for finding this on Reuters.

The Benefits of an Internship




Thanks to Guido Fawkes for publishing this in his blog...

Taxi for Peston


(Guest post from David Beresford)

Christmas is coming the goose isn't getting a bonus. The financial crisis is so boring and there is nothing new to report. So BBC London news last night dedicated a five minute segment to the story of one cab driver. This poor soul had recently purchased a newly designed white taxi for around £35k and was bemoaning the plight of the London cabbie. A few things sprung to mind. Firstly in this economic downturn why would anyone buy a brand new taxi? Secondly why would he buy a vehicle that didn't look like a traditional black cab? Quite possibly the reason that his earnings have started to plummet is that nobody knows he is a cab? 

Another taxi driver gave a better appraisal of the economic situation than that Peston chap, who reappeared to discuss the collapse of Hungary, Ukraine, Iceland and the Isle of White. The afore mentioned taxi driver summed matters up as follows, to precis: "sometimes there are bad days, but so far they haven't added up to bad weeks, but if they do then I am concerned that the bad weeks may become bad months. And if, in a year, there are more than six bad months, well, that is a bad year. "

Thank goodness Spooks is back. However the bomb that killed Adam didn't really look as though it caused that much destruction. The decision to drive the vehicle for two minutes to a random open space seemed a little contrived. Possibly Adam had just had enough of that Hermione Norris woman. 

Sunday, 19 October 2008

Powell Endorses Obama

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for President today in an interview on the NBC programme, Meet the Press. This is a hugely significant development, for Colin Powell is a mighty figure in US politics and respected across all party lines (except maybe the neo-conservatives who he felt let him down after his backing for the war in Iraq). His endorsement is likely to have an impact on undecided voters.

Once seen as a possible Presidential candidate himself, it must have been difficult for him to come out in favour of a candidate outside his own party. But his endorsement is all the more powerful for the words he chose to use in his support for Obama and in his criticisms of John McCain and Sarah Palin. I strongly encourage you to take the time and read them:

I know both of these individuals very well now. I've known John for 25 years as your setup said. And I've gotten to know Mr. Obama quite well over the past two years. Both of them are distinguished Americans who are patriotic, who are dedicated to the welfare of our country. Either one of them, I think, would be a good president. I have said to Mr. McCain that I admire all he has done. I have some concerns about the direction that the party has taken in recent years. It has moved more to the right than I would like to see it, but that's a choice the party makes. And I've said to Mr. Obama, "You have to pass a test of do you have enough experience, and do you bring the judgment to the table that would give us confidence that you would be a good president."

And I've watched him over the past two years, frankly, and I've had this conversation with him. I have especially watched over the last six of seven weeks as both of them have really taken a final exam with respect to this economic crisis that we are in and coming out of the conventions. And I must say that I've gotten a good measure of both. In the case of Mr. McCain, I found that he was a little unsure as to deal with the economic problems that we were having and almost every day there was a different approach to the problem. And that concerned me, sensing that he didn't have a complete grasp of the economic problems that we had. And I was also concerned at the selection of Governor Palin. She's a very distinguished woman, and she's to be admired; but at the same time, now that we have had a chance to watch her for some seven weeks, I don't believe she's ready to be president of the United States, which is the job of the vice president. And so that raised some question in my mind as to the judgment that Senator McCain made.

On the Obama side, I watched Mr. Obama and I watched him during this seven-week period. And he displayed a steadiness, an intellectual curiosity, a depth of knowledge and an approach to looking at problems like this and picking a vice president that, I think, is ready to be president on day one. And also, in not just jumping in and changing every day, but showing intellectual vigor. I think that he has a, a definitive way of doing business that would serve us well. I also believe that on the Republican side over the last seven weeks, the approach of the Republican Party and Mr. McCain has become narrower and narrower. Mr. Obama, at the same time, has given us a more inclusive, broader reach into the needs and aspirations of our people. He's crossing lines--ethnic lines, racial lines, generational lines. He's thinking about all villages have values, all towns have values, not just small towns have values.

And I've also been disappointed, frankly, by some of the approaches that Senator McCain has taken recently, or his campaign ads, on issues that are not really central to the problems that the American people are worried about. This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But Mr. McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him? And why do we have these robocalls going on around the country trying to suggest that, because of this very, very limited relationship that Senator Obama has had with Mr. Ayers, somehow, Mr. Obama is tainted. What they're trying to connect him to is some kind of terrorist feelings. And I think that's inappropriate.

Now, I understand what politics is all about. I know how you can go after one another, and that's good. But I think this goes too far. And I think it has made the McCain campaign look a little narrow. It's not what the American people are looking for. And I look at these kinds of approaches to the campaign and they trouble me. And the party has moved even further to the right, and Governor Palin has indicated a further rightward shift. I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration. I'm also troubled by, not what Senator McCain says, but what members of the party say. And it is permitted to be said such things as, "Well, you know that Mr. Obama is a Muslim." Well, the correct answer is, he is not a Muslim, he's a Christian. He's always been a Christian. But the really right answer is, what if he is? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer's no, that's not America. Is there something wrong with some seven-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president? Yet, I have heard senior members of my own party drop the suggestion, "He's a Muslim and he might be associated terrorists." This is not the way we should be doing it in America.

I feel strongly about this particular point because of a picture I saw in a magazine. It was a photo essay about troops who are serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. And one picture at the tail end of this photo essay was of a mother in Arlington Cemetery, and she had her head on the headstone of her son's grave. And as the picture focused in, you could see the writing on the headstone. And it gave his awards--Purple Heart, Bronze Star--showed that he died in Iraq, gave his date of birth, date of death. He was 20 years old. And then, at the very top of the headstone, it didn't have a Christian cross, it didn't have the Star of David, it had crescent and a star of the Islamic faith. And his name was Kareem Rashad Sultan Khan, and he was an American. He was born in New Jersey. He was 14 years old at the time of 9/11, and he waited until he can go serve his country, and he gave his life. Now, we have got to stop polarizing ourself in this way. And John McCain is as nondiscriminatory as anyone I know. But I'm troubled about the fact that, within the party, we have these kinds of expressions.

So, when I look at all of this and I think back to my Army career, we've got two individuals, either one of them could be a good president. But which is the president that we need now? Which is the individual that serves the needs of the nation for the next period of time? And I come to the conclusion that because of his ability to inspire, because of the inclusive nature of his campaign, because he is reaching out all across America, because of who he is and his rhetorical abilities--and we have to take that into account--as well as his substance--he has both style and substance--he has met the standard of being a successful president, being an exceptional president. I think he is a transformational figure. He is a new generation coming into the world--onto the world stage, onto the American stage, and for that reason I'll be voting for Senator Barack Obama.

He speaks authoritatively. He speaks with great insight into the challenges we're facing of a military and political and economic nature. And he is surrounding himself, I'm confident, with people who'll be able to give him the expertise that he, at the moment, does not have. And so I have watched an individual who has intellectual vigor and who dives deeply into issues and approaches issues with a very, very steady hand. And so I'm confident that he will be ready to take on these challenges on January 21st.

It will also not only electrify our country, I think it'll electrify the world.

My view, as I have said previously on this blog, is that the reputation both domestically and internationally of the office of the President of the United States has so been damaged by the Bush years, and by implication the reputation of the nation as a whole, that a significant change is needed. It is time for a handover to a man who can inspire a new generation of Americans. For a man who can show the world that America can be a positive force in the 21st Century. 

Don't get me wrong, Obama is not perfect. He has his (many) faults and some of his policies may well turn out to be quite problematical. But he is by far the best candidate on offer.  Powell suggests that an Obama Presidency may well electrify the US and electrify the world.  Let's hope he is right, for right now the world needs it...

Friday, 17 October 2008

Daniel James


I just wanted to quote the words today of the parents of Daniel James, the 23 year old who committed suicide in a clinic in Switzerland:

His death was an extremely sad loss for his family, friends and all those that care for him but no doubt a welcome relief from the 'prison' he felt his body had become and the day-to-day fear and loathing of his living existence, as a result of which he took his own life

I hope his friends and family are left in peace now to grieve without further interest from the media, police or campaigners. It was an intensely difficult and personal decision that was made by those involved. It should not be for anyone else to judge them for it...

Hollow Words


"I wouldn't dream of disagreeing with Her Majesty's Coroner, but the facts are..."

Those are the hollow words of the Commander of Joint Helicopter Command, Rear Admiral Tony Johnstone-Burt  in an interview with the BBC today responding to the coroner Andrew Walker's narrative verdict on the death of Cpl Mark Wright in Afghanistan in September 2006.

In the verdict on the incident, in which Mark Wright lost his life and six other soldiers lost limbs, the coroner said:

That a brave soldier is lost in battle is always a matter of deep sadness but when that life is lost where it need not have been because of a lack of equipment and assets those responsible should hang their heads in shame

He listed eight major failures that contributed to the death of the soldier, including the fact that it was the downwash of the Chinook helicopter sent in to rescue the troops that set off the land mines.  His other findings on the causes or contributing factors were:
  • There was a lack of appropriate UK helicopters in Afghanistan fitted with a winch
  • There were administrative delays in sending an appropriate helicopter
  • There was a failure not to ensure that there were sufficient batteries and radio battery charges at the observation posts and this serious failure reduced the ability to communicate by radio.
  • There was  failure not to provide meaningful information to soldiers stationed at these observation posts about the threat of mines in the areas where they were to operate
  • There were failures in the teaching methods used... that resulted in the soldiers, who operated at these forward observation posts, not appreciating that the traditional training to locate and mark mines, as part of clearing a path out of a mined area, were unsuitable for the terrain at Kajaki and that training failed to take account of the technology that was available to better address the detection of mines
  • There was a serious failure to make an assessment of the threat from mines at Kajaki or to take account of local knowledge of the threat from mines
  • here was a serious failure on the part of those responsible for briefing the Chinook helicopter command without making reference to a mine map that indicated the presence of an area known to be mined and the pilot unknowingly planned to land his aircraft in this area
  • There was a serious failure to meet the NATO doctrine to provide, within one hour, advanced resuscitation measures
  • There was an individual failure in that the officer responsible for passing updated information about the mine threat did not understand the information set out in the maps he had been provided with and therefore he was unable to interpret these maps
Yet despite these comprehensive findings, arrived after taking comprehensive evidence from all those involved, Rear Admiral Tony Johnstone-Burt appears on the BBC claiming there was no fault on behalf of the MOD.  He uses spin to deride the coroner's report and hides behind suggesting that this is a time for honouring the bravery a of Mark Wright and the other soldiers not for recriminations.

As an example, when asked specifically about the fact that it was the backwash form the Chinook helicopter that set off the land mines he states:

That not true at all... the facts are that the Chinook did go into the area and landed well clear, at least 40 to 50 metres away

But the coroner didn't make any claim suggesting that it was where the helicopter landed that set off the land mines.  It was the backdraft caused by hovering over the area that was to blame.

It is high time that the MoD showed far more respect in public to those who have laid down their lives for this country and accept that issues with regard to funding, equipment and training have caused and are still causing the deaths of British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.  There has been much discussion about the 'covenant' between the Government and the Armed Forces and whether it has been broken in recent years.  Part of ensuring the covenant works is to admit openly when there have been failures and to do everything possible to correct them. There must be no more hollow words...

Undivided Attention


Gordon Brown has responded to David Camerons's attack this morning on his handling of the economy by saying that "My undivided attention is on taking this county through the difficult times as a result of a global problem that started in America". This echoes previous comments he has made, for instance when in April he said he 'sole foucs' was keeping the economy on track.

I'm sure our troops putting their lives on the line every day in Iran and Afghanistan will be comforted to know that, at a time when we are at war on two fronts, the Prime Minister's sole focus and undivided attention lays elsewhere...

Thursday, 16 October 2008

Madonna stops financial crisis


(Guest post from David Beresford)

I am not one to typically wish ill on people, but thank heavens for the divorce announcement of Guy Ritchie and Madonna. For almost five minutes on the BBC evening news we were spared the on going misery of the economic turmoil, the escalation in unemployment and general doom and gloom.  This however was a brief respite, and this evenings Panorama, 'Britain in the red', provided the opportunity for the BBC to spend an hour analyzing where it all went wrong. 

Media in the UK is obsessed with making the economic situation appear catastrophic. The figures don't look great, but unemployment of forecast two million at the end on the year is still very low and compared to Europe not a concern. Inflation is set to fall sharply and the Bank will be aggressively cutting rates over the coming months. Property prices have faced a significant correction, but are only retracing the excessive rises over the last few years. Things are really not that bad. 

Well that is strictly not quite the case. The 'financial crisis', suitably more dramatic than a mere 'credit crunch', has pushed Robert Peston into a media celebrity. Just the very mention of his name makes me change channel. He is probably being lined up for the next reality celebrity show. Given his recent elevation in notoriety perhaps it should be 'Dancing on Icesave'?

The Maverick Goes to Washington


Several blogs and papers are reporting on the really wonderful and, in many ways, scary new website: palinaspresident.com

The site gives us an intriguing glimpse into what the Oval Office might be like if Sarah Palin occupied it. It's eerily believable! Go check it out and click around the Oval Office - see what it would be like if an Alaskan hockey mum maverick became President...

The Final Debate


Well, the final debate has finished. Reading the press it seems that the consensus of opinion is that McCain performed well - maybe his best yet. Obama held his own and was his usual calm self.  The instant polls mark it a victory to Obama though, as they have will all the previous debates.

But in contrast to those who thought that McCain had a very strong performance (for instance James Forsyth over at the Coffee House), I though McCain's performance seemed... odd.

He started off looking and sounding nervous, his eyes wide while facing the cameras, his pupils were dilated and he had a noticeably high blink rate.  He was constantly moving about on his chair as he talked.   His first line saying 'Americans are hurting' was the same first line he used at the previous 'Town-Hall' debate which negated any sincerity the line might have.  He then managed to mangle the rest of that opening statement.

I thought he sounded weak on healthcare, compared to Obama's direct and numbered plan. He knows this is a strong area for Obama and should have moved swiftly away from it.  It was interesting watching the debate on CNN to see just how high Obama's approval ratings were form a panel of voters when discussing healthcare.

On some issues he sounded crotchety, on others like he was making too big an effort to be animated. When he smiled at Obama's responses it looked like it was through gritted teeth. Indignation over the negative campaigning came across as false and hollow, especially given what's come out of the McCain camp recently.

I thought his 'share the wealth' attack was misplaced and parried well.   Even if it might play well with Republicans, no swing voter is going to object to the very rich paying a little more tax to fund cuts for the remaining 95% of the population.   McCain didn't talks about the 'middle classes', where as Obama's very first statement directly referred to them.  His 'Joe the Plumber' attack fell flat when Obama pointed out that no small business would pay healthcare fines, and that larger business has an obligation to their employees over health care provision.

It was a missed chance, for Obama did not have his best performance.  Apart from healthcare, many answers seems to meander.  Often it was clear that Obama was starting sentences with no idea what he was actually going to say in them.  Other sentences started on one track only to abruptly stop or change direction.  But when he was weak or dithering, McCain didn't spot it and go in for the kill.

Overall, I felt this was a clear win for Obama and a huge missed chance for McCain. I thought McCain looked like a desperate man and produced a very strange performance. I said yesterday that it might be the last chance saloon for McCain.  Well, he missed that last chance...

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Last Chance Saloon

Tonight sees the final televised Presidential debate between Barack Obama and John McCain. It may well be John McCain's last chance to land some telling blows on his opponent and close the consistent deficit in the polls being reported daily.

Of course, there's still time to find a 'game-changing' moment after tonight, but with a likely audience of around 60 million Americans he is unlikely to be able to have an impact on so may voters - especially those swing voters. There is a chance the impact might be a negative one but at this stage it's looking like he's got nothing to lose.

To his credit, in recent days McCain seems to have become embarrassed by the ever more personal attacks of some of his more extreme (or ignorant?) supporters. His immediate put down at a rally of a woman he called Obama 'an Arab' was commendable. But if he isn't going to push the personal assassination of Obama does he have anything left?

The challenge he faces tonight is reported in Time today:

With less than three weeks to go before Election Day, the Republican presidential nominee faces a daunting overall task. He is so far behind in the national polls and in most key individual states that it is difficult to assemble a single combination of Electoral College votes to get him to the necessary 270. Despite Monday's unprecedented stock market rebound and Tuesday's campaign announcement introducing a new McCain economic policy proposal, voters largely continue to blame the Republicans for the financial crisis and the gloomy mood of an unstable nation. At the same time, the impact of Obama's massive fundraising advantage has hit full force, flooding battleground states with television ads, direct mail, and well-paid armies of local organizers. As Obama's lead has held (and even grown in some polls) pundits and political strategists in both parties have begun to assertively predict an easy Obama win, possibly producing a self-fulfilling wave.

I'm afraid I have to agree with the conclusion the article comes to and that is the only thing McCain may have left to fight for is his reputation:

McCain's best bet is to ignore all the advice he is getting about what he needs to accomplish and how he should comport himself: don't try to be all things to all strategists. Instead, he should say what he truly believes about his own proposals, about Obama's qualifications, and about the challenges the country faces, without an over-crafted strategy. His debate performances have improved, and he is always his most likeable, and most formidable when he uses his head and speaks from the heart. To slightly tweak the wise old song, dignity is just another word for nothing left to lose. McCain might lose the election, but he doesn't have to lose his reputation in the process.

McCain's task was always going to be an uphill battle.  He was only grudgingly adopted as his party's Presidential nominee in the absence of any other genuinely credible candidate (would it have been different had Rudy Giuliani had better strategic advice, or Fred Thompson had entered the race earlier?). He was facing an opponent with formidable organisation and money (and that would not have different had he been facing Hillary Clinton). He has been presented with a domestic and foreign policy legacy from George Bush that gives him and his party nothing to boast about.

If John McCain was to be President of the USA, then maybe the time was eight years ago when he was beaten in the nomination race by Bush.  But maybe he has something up his sleeve even more surprising (and it will need to be more effective and better thought out) than Sarah Palin. Maybe Obama will make a gaffe so big it will see a reversal in the polls.  But he must worry that the big maybe is tonight's debate - maybe Hampstead N.Y. is the last chance saloon...